<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Domain News &#187; Domain Knowledgebase</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamereview.com/category/domain-knowledgebase/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamereview.com</link>
	<description>Domain Name News </description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:18:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google Cracks Down on Stolen Content</title>
		<link>http://domainnamereview.com/google-cracks-down-on-stolen-content/3035/</link>
		<comments>http://domainnamereview.com/google-cracks-down-on-stolen-content/3035/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 03:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>domainqueen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain Knowledgebase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content farms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scrapebox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scraper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xrumer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamereview.com/?p=3035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tired of seeing scraped sited do better in the SERPs than your home grown content farm? Google announced this week the maturity of new algorithmic analysis of sites to provide search clients with site sources and results closer to the source of such content. Industry uproar over Xrumer, scrapebox, and other scraping tools has pre-empted this change. Web spam is a sore point to many webmasters who write or source their own original content, only to see it scraped to all points f the compass, largely without credit or permission.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://domainnamereview.com/google-cracks-down-on-stolen-content/3035/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Women Com in GE/ NBC Legal Dispute</title>
		<link>http://domainnamereview.com/women-com-in-ge-nbc-legal-dispute/3024/</link>
		<comments>http://domainnamereview.com/women-com-in-ge-nbc-legal-dispute/3024/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2011 21:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>domainqueen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain Auctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain Legal Matters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[million]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sedo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamereview.com/?p=3024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes Domain sales go wrong. Witness the legal issues between NBC Universal and the Sedo buyer of both Women.com and Women.net to NBC and iVillage. The ex parte motions read like civil matters gone amok, except that a huge amount of clicks are at stake. Benjamin Padnos of Done Ventures sold the names on Sedo. But minus amenable settlement of the deal he tried filing a restraining order on NBC Universal, one of the biggest names and companies in entertainment with an ambitious online campaign for programming and marketing. With control of the actual name, every day that goes by is a win for the Peacock, and a loss for the Sedo buyer.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://domainnamereview.com/women-com-in-ge-nbc-legal-dispute/3024/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet ID Bill Looms In USA</title>
		<link>http://domainnamereview.com/internet-id-bill-looms-in-usa/2982/</link>
		<comments>http://domainnamereview.com/internet-id-bill-looms-in-usa/2982/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2011 04:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>domainqueen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain Knowledgebase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamereview.com/?p=2982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How does this touch on domainers? Users will have to think twice before visiting a site they may not want to be tracked and recognized by. And what about the huge population of immigrant Americans with no citizenship, will their web use be the hidden tumbleweed sweeping across the information superhighway? How this will affect online end user traffic is unclear. But if the U. S. government can't control the type of secure documentation that Wikileaks now publishes online, should they be running any bureau of identity and security for Web use?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://domainnamereview.com/internet-id-bill-looms-in-usa/2982/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Registrars Not Spammer Responsible</title>
		<link>http://domainnamereview.com/registrars-not-spammer-responsible/2909/</link>
		<comments>http://domainnamereview.com/registrars-not-spammer-responsible/2909/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 05:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>domainqueen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain Legal Matters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamereview.com/?p=2909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Balsam did his homework and argued that he was a 3rd party beneficiary according to the ICANN Registrar Accreditation Agreement. Tucows and all  registrars must operate according to these terms. has the door been opened for spammers everywhere providing they purchase domains with Privacy options and conduct business until found out?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://domainnamereview.com/registrars-not-spammer-responsible/2909/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Case for Cloud Computing?</title>
		<link>http://domainnamereview.com/no-case-for-cloud-computing/2823/</link>
		<comments>http://domainnamereview.com/no-case-for-cloud-computing/2823/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 03:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>domainqueen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain Knowledgebase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamereview.com/?p=2823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How can cloud computing increase SEO results? The cloud computing advertising and promotion campaigns have taken root in industry and programming. Why is their an antidote to more hardware that does not build on database driven and query based sites? How does a self service manager in cloud computing programming save time and money? The proponents of cloud computing welcome new members on the bandwagon but when the hayride is over what value is left?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://domainnamereview.com/no-case-for-cloud-computing/2823/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did you ever wonder what the first registered domain was? Here is a list of the &#8220;First 100&#8243; registered domains.</title>
		<link>http://domainnamereview.com/first-100-domain-names/2812/</link>
		<comments>http://domainnamereview.com/first-100-domain-names/2812/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 00:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Domain News</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain Knowledgebase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First 100 Domain Names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History of Domain Name]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamereview.com/?p=2812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did you know the oldest domain name is 25 years old, and what the first registered ever domain was?
Here are some interesting facts about the history of Domain names and the Domain Name System:
Symbolics.Com was the first .COM domain, which was registered on March 15 1985. 
CSS.GOV was the first .GOV domain, which was registered in June 1985. 
Mitre.Org was the first .ORG domain, which was registered in July 1985.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://domainnamereview.com/first-100-domain-names/2812/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>to Dmoz or not to Dmoz?</title>
		<link>http://domainnamereview.com/to-dmoz-or-not-to-dmoz/2637/</link>
		<comments>http://domainnamereview.com/to-dmoz-or-not-to-dmoz/2637/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 19:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>domainqueen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain Knowledgebase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dmoz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domainers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inclusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamereview.com/?p=2637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To DMOZ, or not to DMOZ-That is the question. Friends, Domainers, name-countrymen, lend me your bandwidth. The topic at hand is the much-ballyhooed DMOZ directory inclusion which has come under speculation by many domainers of late as to relevancy and utility. Is it fair to webmasters and domainers that the inclusion of Adsense or Google (or any ads) is a mystery factor that is a variable for each application?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://domainnamereview.com/to-dmoz-or-not-to-dmoz/2637/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Verisign Raising Rates</title>
		<link>http://domainnamereview.com/verisign-raising-rates/2251/</link>
		<comments>http://domainnamereview.com/verisign-raising-rates/2251/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 03:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>domainqueen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain Legal Matters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verisign]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamereview.com/?p=2251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Causing a ruffle in the domainer feathers this week was the news that Verisign was originating an across the board name registration/renewal hike. This price increase comes not at a bad time in the economy, but at a questionable time for lower end domainers struggling to retain the bulk of the names in their portfolios. Verisign resellers (known or unknown registry holders) and tier priced administrators of select name and TLD portfolio based holdings are concerned.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://domainnamereview.com/verisign-raising-rates/2251/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Triple X Adult TLD to Realize?</title>
		<link>http://domainnamereview.com/triple-x-adult-tld-to-realize/2242/</link>
		<comments>http://domainnamereview.com/triple-x-adult-tld-to-realize/2242/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 06:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>domainqueen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain Knowledgebase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain Legal Matters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.XXX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adult]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICANN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[name]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamereview.com/?p=2242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The triple X adult domain top level domain may be coming to the Web, industry watchers report. The domainers watching this industry quake wonder if the adult online industry, mostly composed of fee-paid video and image services related to pornography, can be a reasonable addition to Internet commerce as such. The lines are being drawn on both sides of the TLD divide. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://domainnamereview.com/triple-x-adult-tld-to-realize/2242/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ticketed TN Man buys Local PD Domain</title>
		<link>http://domainnamereview.com/ticketed-tn-man-buys-local-pd-domain/2217/</link>
		<comments>http://domainnamereview.com/ticketed-tn-man-buys-local-pd-domain/2217/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 15:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>domainqueen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain Legal Matters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bluff city]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[man]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mccrary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamereview.com/?p=2217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They don't mess around with domains lightly in Bluff City, Tennessee. Brian McCrary of Tennessee got a $90 ticket for speeding and when he went to the police website and saw the pending renewal notice, he floored his credit card and nabbed the domain when it dropped.

Talk about a speed trap on the information superhighway! McCrary got the perfect revenge.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://domainnamereview.com/ticketed-tn-man-buys-local-pd-domain/2217/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

