<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Domain News &#187; China</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamereview.com/tags/china/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamereview.com</link>
	<description>Domain Name News </description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:18:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Chinese Firm to Buy Godaddy.com?</title>
		<link>http://domainnamereview.com/chinese-firm-to-buy-godaddy-com/2645/</link>
		<comments>http://domainnamereview.com/chinese-firm-to-buy-godaddy-com/2645/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 20:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>domainqueen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Available Domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain Auctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bob parsons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[danica patrick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[godaddy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamereview.com/?p=2645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Or could China, newly emerging as the era's leading moneymaker, pick off Godaddy and suddenly own 50% of the Western world's hosting files? Bob Parsons may need to be raising some extra cash because Godaddy.com is up on the auction block. Reliable news or rumor? Domainers were stunned today when the Wall Street Journal announced the celebrated blog-era registrar and massive hosting company Godaddy.com is for sale. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://domainnamereview.com/chinese-firm-to-buy-godaddy-com/2645/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mind.cn  sold for $20,000</title>
		<link>http://domainnamereview.com/mind-cn-sold-for-20000/2235/</link>
		<comments>http://domainnamereview.com/mind-cn-sold-for-20000/2235/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 12:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Domain News</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.cn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[end]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mind.cn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamereview.com/?p=2235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I haven&#8217;t seen any .cn domains sold in xx,xxx range previously and I now notice a domain sale of Mind.cn for $20,000. It was a very good domain sale for a .cn (China extension) domain. I believe it is sold to an end user. The domain, Mind.cn was sold at the Sedo domain marketplace. The [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://domainnamereview.com/mind-cn-sold-for-20000/2235/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Godaddy Boots .CN Namesells</title>
		<link>http://domainnamereview.com/1572/1572/</link>
		<comments>http://domainnamereview.com/1572/1572/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>domainqueen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.cn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[godaddy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamereview.com/?p=1572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[China's surveillance and monitoring of the Internet activities of its citizens has unsettled many human rights legislators and internet business operators. As China changes the internet model, so may they also see declines in international traffic and online profit taking opportunities from Western consumers.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://domainnamereview.com/1572/1572/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google China: What Went Wrong?</title>
		<link>http://domainnamereview.com/google-china-what-went-wrong/1055/</link>
		<comments>http://domainnamereview.com/google-china-what-went-wrong/1055/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>domainqueen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyberattack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamereview.com/?p=1055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Evidently the overarching deal terms to whatever agreement Google had with China didn't stipulate clearly enough that Google's brand and emechanisms would be falling under the red banner. Did China backwards engineer a Google fault or did they use proprietary technology to spark a lethal cyberattack against (American) competitors online?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://domainnamereview.com/google-china-what-went-wrong/1055/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Google Flowers for China</title>
		<link>http://domainnamereview.com/no-google-flowers-for-china/1014/</link>
		<comments>http://domainnamereview.com/no-google-flowers-for-china/1014/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>domainqueen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flowers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamereview.com/?p=1014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chinese citizens, grateful to Google for stepping up against the unholy internet filters, started leaving flowers at the China location for Google, reports say. Chinese citizens are aware they are getting shafted by Chinese government policies and are happy someone is finally standing up to Big Red.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://domainnamereview.com/no-google-flowers-for-china/1014/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China Strangles Google Access, Users</title>
		<link>http://domainnamereview.com/china-strangles-google-access-users/1003/</link>
		<comments>http://domainnamereview.com/china-strangles-google-access-users/1003/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 08:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>domainqueen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamereview.com/?p=1003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[China continues to pretend it isn't strangling natural growth and internet access to its citizens; Google isn't buying. When will China figure out that political doubletalk doesn't equal partnership? A BBC story details the myopic projection of Chinese Internet policies as the world's biggest Internet company threatens to walk.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://domainnamereview.com/china-strangles-google-access-users/1003/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China delimits Internet Webmaking</title>
		<link>http://domainnamereview.com/chine-delimits-internet-webmaking/678/</link>
		<comments>http://domainnamereview.com/chine-delimits-internet-webmaking/678/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 17:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>domainqueen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamereview.com/?p=678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As befits a national government free of corruption, China today underscored its intent to censor Internet activity centered on website launches and content creation, citing prevention of child-based pornography, piracy, and fraud. Yet transparently this seems to many to be a way for the current political establishment to elimination development of the opposition.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://domainnamereview.com/chine-delimits-internet-webmaking/678/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review ICANN policy for disputed domains&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://domainnamereview.com/review-icann-policy-for-disputed-domains/485/</link>
		<comments>http://domainnamereview.com/review-icann-policy-for-disputed-domains/485/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 21:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>domainqueen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain Aftermarket]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain Knowledgebase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain Legal Matters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domainers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complaint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disputed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICANN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[west coast university]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamereview.com/?p=485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ICANN holds that passive holding of a disputed domain name permits an unlawful inference of registration and domain use in bad faith. The other two tenets of disputed domains]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://domainnamereview.com/review-icann-policy-for-disputed-domains/485/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Triple two dot com earns big&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://domainnamereview.com/triple-two-dot-com-earns-big/428/</link>
		<comments>http://domainnamereview.com/triple-two-dot-com-earns-big/428/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>domainqueen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain Auctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[222]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[numerology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sedo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamereview.com/?p=428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sedo.com has sold the 3 number domain name 222.com for $49,000 USD . A Chinese buyer makes sense, especially in China's emerging internet landscape]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://domainnamereview.com/triple-two-dot-com-earns-big/428/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chinese Name Checkers</title>
		<link>http://domainnamereview.com/chinese-name-checkers/308/</link>
		<comments>http://domainnamereview.com/chinese-name-checkers/308/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 02:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>domainqueen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain Knowledgebase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamereview.com/?p=308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Domainers continue to coalesce around the Chinese name market as well as they can. Complex entry into the Chinese domain name market may spell competition and obstacles.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://domainnamereview.com/chinese-name-checkers/308/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

