<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Domain News &#187; ICANN</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamereview.com/tags/icann/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamereview.com</link>
	<description>Domain Name News </description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:18:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Bill Clinton Addresses ICANN March 2011</title>
		<link>http://domainnamereview.com/bill-clinton-to-address-february-namers-meet/2992/</link>
		<comments>http://domainnamereview.com/bill-clinton-to-address-february-namers-meet/2992/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 00:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>domainqueen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[address]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domainers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICANN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[san francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silicon valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamereview.com/?p=2992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember back in the day when the Internet was in full swing and no TLD seemed out of bounds? This year's March ICANN meeting in Silicon Valley/San Francisco gives domainers a sprinkling of that same flavor when Former United States President William Jefferson Clinton gives the keynote address for the domain namers gathered there.  Clinton formed ICANN back in 1998, when the World Wide Web needed strong controls, formal structure, and organized oversight. Domaining partners sponsoring the upcoming  event will shoulder the fee, which will not be insubstantial. Predictions of  the opening line of the address go something like, "Ask not what your domain can do for you, but what can you do for your domain". The deep pockets of the players raised eyebrows, making one domainer comment, "Bob Parsons could probably get the Queen".]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://domainnamereview.com/bill-clinton-to-address-february-namers-meet/2992/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Triple X Stutters in Cartagena</title>
		<link>http://domainnamereview.com/triple-x-stutters-in-cartagena/2882/</link>
		<comments>http://domainnamereview.com/triple-x-stutters-in-cartagena/2882/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 23:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>domainqueen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cartajena]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domainer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICANN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[triple x]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamereview.com/?p=2882</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The flow of all things toward a triple x TLD may have slowed somewhat. ICANN has yet to blaze a trail of "Yes", although this is the big "Y" that in this case come before 'X". This week's Cartajenan cartel o' domainers lagged and dragged their usual feet and decided much of nothing quick-like. The public comment period for the triple X domain TLD is now open, and what a roistering circus it promises to be. To those domainers automatically knee-jerked into ponying up another renewal fee for an undesirable domain TLD, comment at ICANN.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://domainnamereview.com/triple-x-stutters-in-cartagena/2882/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is ICANN XXX Crazy?</title>
		<link>http://domainnamereview.com/is-icann-xxx-crazy/2421/</link>
		<comments>http://domainnamereview.com/is-icann-xxx-crazy/2421/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 00:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>domainqueen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.XXX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adult]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[board. appicant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICANN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamereview.com/?p=2421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vaunted and august Internet governing body ICANN seems to have its feathers in a knot over the latest sublevel TLD that's trying to make it to the Show as a top level domain. Avid domain speculators and adult name domain owners are watching the latest reports to determine which way the metronome is leaning. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://domainnamereview.com/is-icann-xxx-crazy/2421/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Triple X Adult TLD to Realize?</title>
		<link>http://domainnamereview.com/triple-x-adult-tld-to-realize/2242/</link>
		<comments>http://domainnamereview.com/triple-x-adult-tld-to-realize/2242/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 06:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>domainqueen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain Knowledgebase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain Legal Matters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.XXX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adult]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICANN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[name]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamereview.com/?p=2242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The triple X adult domain top level domain may be coming to the Web, industry watchers report. The domainers watching this industry quake wonder if the adult online industry, mostly composed of fee-paid video and image services related to pornography, can be a reasonable addition to Internet commerce as such. The lines are being drawn on both sides of the TLD divide. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://domainnamereview.com/triple-x-adult-tld-to-realize/2242/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Strict Domain Rules on Horizon</title>
		<link>http://domainnamereview.com/strict-domain-rules-on-horizon/1507/</link>
		<comments>http://domainnamereview.com/strict-domain-rules-on-horizon/1507/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>domainqueen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICANN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rules]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamereview.com/?p=1507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The governing bodies who rule over the domain world have been tightening their practices all over the world, including Russia and China. While domainers worldwide know how to leverage their contacts and connections to register domains, the powers that be intend to limit that dynamic in future.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://domainnamereview.com/strict-domain-rules-on-horizon/1507/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dot Music Fronts TLD name Success</title>
		<link>http://domainnamereview.com/dot-music-fronts-tld-name-success/1200/</link>
		<comments>http://domainnamereview.com/dot-music-fronts-tld-name-success/1200/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 23:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>domainqueen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICANN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tld]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamereview.com/?p=1200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The .Music (Dot Music)url destination claims two million global subscribrs to the domain based music portal. This unique music interchange serves as the type of platform many TLD applications to ICANN envision but can be speculative about potential for delivery. The .music address story serves as a functional exemplar to the success many ICANN TLD formation. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://domainnamereview.com/dot-music-fronts-tld-name-success/1200/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ICANN Wrestles Character Alphabets</title>
		<link>http://domainnamereview.com/icann-wrestle-character-alphabets/711/</link>
		<comments>http://domainnamereview.com/icann-wrestle-character-alphabets/711/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 06:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>domainqueen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain Aftermarket]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain Legal Matters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alphabet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICANN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamereview.com/?p=711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ICANN is developing Web addresses that can be written in other languages. Suffix, such as the "com" after the dot, must be typed in Roman letters. The suffix known as a TLD on the Internet  expressed in 17 other alphabets. ICANN directors and advisors meet in Seoul this week to wrestle technical issues. Characters look the same but mean something different, which is particularly difficult with Chinese, the language that may someday be one of the most heavily used for Internet addresses.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://domainnamereview.com/icann-wrestle-character-alphabets/711/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Foreign Generics Ramping Up</title>
		<link>http://domainnamereview.com/foreign-generics-hot/577/</link>
		<comments>http://domainnamereview.com/foreign-generics-hot/577/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 21:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>domainqueen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain Aftermarket]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domainers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.mx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[codes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[country]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICANN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tld]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamereview.com/?p=577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Connecting owners of generic buyers can cement a domain investment and offer a package to potential buyer down the line.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://domainnamereview.com/foreign-generics-hot/577/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Geo TLD Flood Garners Industry Scrutiny</title>
		<link>http://domainnamereview.com/geo-tld-flood-garners-industry-scrutiny/567/</link>
		<comments>http://domainnamereview.com/geo-tld-flood-garners-industry-scrutiny/567/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>domainqueen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[country]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICANN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tld]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamereview.com/?p=567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Big new changes regarding geographic markets across the globe have been happening behind the scenes. Only domainers have been watching the flurry of new ICANN based releases with professional regard. Will overexposure of new and competitive name platforms diminish existing value? Will a move toward auctioning or liquidating names weaken the domain name resales market?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://domainnamereview.com/geo-tld-flood-garners-industry-scrutiny/567/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Int&#8217;l Doms get ICANN nod</title>
		<link>http://domainnamereview.com/intl-doms-get-icann-nod/524/</link>
		<comments>http://domainnamereview.com/intl-doms-get-icann-nod/524/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>domainqueen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain Legal Matters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dimains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICANN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[latin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamereview.com/?p=524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers is expected to take another step on Friday. ICANN, during its annual meeting in Seoul, Korea, will vote on the internationalized domain names (IDN) initiative, better known as the Fast Track. If approved, the launch of the Fast Track process would be Nov. 16]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://domainnamereview.com/intl-doms-get-icann-nod/524/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

