<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Domain News &#187; scam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamereview.com/tags/scam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamereview.com</link>
	<description>Domain Name News </description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:18:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Wanted: Internet Url Police</title>
		<link>http://domainnamereview.com/wanted-internet-url-police/1122/</link>
		<comments>http://domainnamereview.com/wanted-internet-url-police/1122/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>domainqueen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain Legal Matters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chairty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[haiti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[url]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamereview.com/?p=1122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the Haiti relief flowed to the disaster area, scammers were registering exploitative domain names and setting up false charity websites to target well-meaning donaters. The London Daily News featured a story on the opportunistic and fraudulent nature of these scams, but experts wonder if an Internet policing authority might not be appropriate to take down sites before the public gets scammed. When you are one url away from getting fleeced, wouldn't it be prudent to have set some domain handling controls in place?
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://domainnamereview.com/wanted-internet-url-police/1122/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Super-Premium Domain Lock Feature</title>
		<link>http://domainnamereview.com/super-premium-domain-lock-feature/571/</link>
		<comments>http://domainnamereview.com/super-premium-domain-lock-feature/571/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>domainqueen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain Legal Matters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domainers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebay. resales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraudulent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[godaddy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p2p.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamereview.com/?p=571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obviously, there needs to be a premium service for those premium value domains that required voice print technology approving the transfer. The recording of vocal digital signature and source IP, home phone and/or webcam requirement should be a basic feature for domains in the $160,000 and $200,000 range. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://domainnamereview.com/super-premium-domain-lock-feature/571/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michael Jackson com @ $12 Million US</title>
		<link>http://domainnamereview.com/michael-jackson-com-12-million-us/262/</link>
		<comments>http://domainnamereview.com/michael-jackson-com-12-million-us/262/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 23:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>domainqueen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain Knowledgebase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain Legal Matters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamereview.com/?p=262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Currently the demand and trade speed diminishes the capacity of the BBB to keep up. Michael Jackson coverage still is featured on every newspaper front page around the world. Opportunism knows no bounds]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://domainnamereview.com/michael-jackson-com-12-million-us/262/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

